Discover more from Coin Metrics' State of the Network
Coin Metrics' State of the Network: Issue 155
Tuesday, May 17th, 2022
Get the best data-driven crypto insights and analysis every week:
Surveying Stablecoins in the Wake of the LUNA/UST Collapse
Stablecoins have come under increased scrutiny over the last week following TerraUSD’s (UST) sudden collapse. On May 12th, Tether (USDT) – the largest stablecoin today by total supply – started to dip below its $1 peg, causing some brief panic as price dropped as low as $.95. But it rebounded quickly, returning back to over $.99 within 7 hours.
Despite questions surrounding Tether in the past, USDT has a very different risk profile than non-collateralized stablecoins like UST. In short, Tether has a fundamentally different stabilization mechanism than TerraUSD: USDT is backed by a reserve of cash and cash equivalents as well as some secured loans and corporate bonds. A full breakdown of Tether’s reserves (as of December 31, 2021) can be found on their website.
May 12th’s Tether price de-pegging was its largest deviation from $1 since March 2020. But prior to 2020, it survived even larger de-peggings. The last year has been the most stable period in USDT’s history.
TerraUSD, on the other hand, was “backed” by LUNA and a basket of other cryptocurrencies including BTC and AVAX. However, UST was not collateralized in the same sense as Tether - UST’s price stability essentially depended on continuous demand for LUNA.
TerraUSD’s redemption system let any holder redeem 1 UST for $1 worth of LUNA. This worked while the price of LUNA was going up but quickly spiraled out of control as LUNA price plummeted. LUNA supply eventually ballooned to over 40B as more LUNA was printed to keep up with demand for UST redemptions.
UST’s reliance on LUNA created an increased risk of loss of faith and de-pegging during sudden drops in the crypto market, especially considering most cryptoassets are still highly correlated to each other. As the price of LUNA and other cryptoassets plummeted holders of UST lost confidence which effectively sparked a bank run.
Tether’s redemption system works differently. Tether holders can redeem their USDT for USD, but Tether has a minimum fiat withdrawal amount of $100,000, and redeemers also must follow Tether’s KYC procedure. When the price of Tether falls below $1 there is an incentive to buy it below the peg and redeem it for the full dollar, capturing an arbitrage. This is contingent upon being able to actually redeem the USDT, however.
Tether had over $3.3B of redemptions on May 12th, by far the largest in its history. USDT free float supply dropped by another $2.8B on May 13th, and $961M on May 14th.
But as some redeemed their USDT, others apparently moved into USD Coin (USDC). USDC free float supply has increased by about 1.5B since May 10th, despite declining since late February.
USDC is fully backed by cash and cash equivalents and publishes monthly attestation reports, making it highly trusted amongst the major stablecoins. Last year, USDC issuer Circle announced its plans to become a national bank in the United States under the supervision of the Federal Reserve, U.S. Treasury, OCC, and FDIC.
The market reactions over the past week are a reminder that stablecoins are far from homogenous and carry different reserve profiles with varying risk, not unlike banks in traditional finance.
The crypto markets are still assessing the aftermath of the UST collapse but one immediate effect has been a drawdown in stablecoin liquidity within DeFi. The amount of USDC held in smart contracts on Ethereum has fallen by about $5B since its peak in March. Similarly, the supply of DAI (an over-collateralized, crypto-backed stablecoin) in smart contracts has also fallen about $2B. Most of this decline can be attributed to weakening demand for DAI on decentralized exchanges, cross-blockchain bridges, and lending protocols. Estimates of total value locked (TVL) have also come down, but these measures are often exaggerated due to rehypothecation of assets.
Stablecoins are a critical part of the crypto ecosystem and will undoubtedly continue to come under scrutiny over the upcoming months. To follow the stablecoin data used in this piece and explore our other on-chain metrics check out our free charting tool, correlation tool, and mobile apps.
Network Data Insights
On-chain activity was up across the board last week as volatility accelerated in the crypto markets. Bitcoin daily active addresses averaged over 1M for the first time since Dec 2021. Ethereum active addresses averaged close to 600K/day last week, up 8% week-over-week. Every stablecoin tracked above had higher daily active addresses over the week. Every ERC-20 token with the exception of wrapped ETH (WETH) saw higher transfer volume and active addresses.
As market activity has picked up, Bitcoin's mempool has been the most busy it's been since last July. The mempool is where nodes keep unconfirmed transactions that have been broadcasted to the network but have not yet been included in a valid block.
The mempool is important to track because a more congested mempool can mean a more competitive Bitcoin fee market. However, Bitcoin fees remain somewhat subdued compared to this time last year; the average transaction fee on May 12, 2021 was $13, last Friday it was ~$3.
Coin Metrics Updates
This week’s updates from the Coin Metrics team:
For the best in-depth discussion of CM data and research, come check out our research community on the web3 social media platform gm.xyz.
Check out Coin Metrics’ market-data focused newsletter State of the Market.
As always, if you have any feedback or requests please let us know here.
Subscribe and Past Issues
Coin Metrics’ State of the Network, is an unbiased, weekly view of the crypto market informed by our own network (on-chain) and market data.
Check out the Coin Metrics Blog for more in depth research and analysis.
© 2022 Coin Metrics Inc. All rights reserved. Redistribution is not permitted without consent. This newsletter does not constitute investment advice and is for informational purposes only and you should not make an investment decision on the basis of this information. The newsletter is provided “as is” and Coin Metrics will not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from information obtained from the newsletter.